ARTICLE

PERIPHERAL COLD WAR A PERSPECTIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND PAKISTAN RELATIONS

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

03 Pages : 17-27

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).03      10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).03      Published : Sep 2022

Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations

Abstract

    India and Pakistan have long history of animosity which is evident in their bilateral relations. Defining the politics of security is an attempt to first develop the comprehensive definition of security in India Pakistan case and engender certain knowledge that how the threats are surfacing in other aspects of state affairs. The political, economic and social sectors have associated with security while strategic relations of India and United States to counter China are also very important aspects of Pakistan security proposition. This research paper seeks to have a latest oversight to observe how these changing relations might incriminate the strategic environment of South Asia and specifically in Pakistan India relations and how the strategic importance of these periphery’s lead them to cooperate with strong states to get the military and economic benefits. The conflict and strategic relations with the powerful states to maintain the balance of power, forms the peripheral cold war.

    Balance of Power, Bipolarity, Identity, Peripheral Cold War, Politics of Security, Strategic Environment

    (1) Abrar Ul Haq
    PhD Scholar, Department of Political Science, University of Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Mubeen Adnan
    Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Acharya, A. (1994). The Periphery As The Core:the third world and security studies. Strategies in Conflict: Critical Approaches to Security Studies (p. 20). Toronto: the Centre for International and Strategic Studies. http://www.yorku.ca/yciss/publications/OP28-Acharya.pdf
  • Ayoob, M. (1995). The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System, Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853778
  • Buzan, B. (1987). An Introduction to strategic military technology and international relations. The Macmillan press.
  • Buzan, B. (1983). People states and fear. Thomas Press.
  • North, C. D. (2003). Institutions and Economic Growth:A historical introduction. In D. A. Jeffry A.Frieden, International political economy perspective on global power and wealth (p. 14). Routledge.
  • Deria, J. D. (1992). Anti-Diplomacy: Spies, Terror, Speed and War, Basil Blackwell.
  • Elman, C. (2006). Realism. In P. D. Williams, Security studies an introduction (p. 12). Routledge.
  • Harbom, L., & Wallensteen, P. (2010). ‘Armed Conflicts 1946-2009’, Journal of Peace Research, 47(4), 501-509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310376
  • Hari, S. (2004). India & US Relations: Ground Relaities.
  • Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in international politics. Princeton University press.
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1996a). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, Columbia University Press.
  • Khan, H. (2013). Pakistan’s Contribution to the global war on terror after 9/11. IPRI Journal, 13(1), 37-56.
  • Kilgour, D. M., & Zagare, F. C. (2001). The Impact of Conventional Force Reductions on Strategic Deterrence: A Game-Theoretic Analysis. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 7(2), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1045
  • Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, 20(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214
  • Kolodziej, E. A. (2005). Security and international relations. Cambridge University press.
  • Lalwani, S., & Wheeler, T. (2017). Southern Asia’s Escalating Strategic Competition. https://warontherocks.com/2017/08/southern-asias-escalating-strategiccompetition/
  • Mcdonald, M. (2006). Constructivism. In P. D. Williams, Security studies an introduction (p. 13). Routledge.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. University of Chicago.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1969). Politics among Nations a Struggle for Power and Peace. Peking University press.
  • Mallik, R. (2019). Indo-US Relations during George Walker Bush administration (PhD Thesis). Centre for South Asian Studies, Pondicherry University.
  • Parpart, J., & Shaw, T. M. (2013). Endorsement. Journal of China and International Relations, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jcir.v1i1.213
  • Pande, A. (2019, 04 25). The US wants India to be its partner in confronting China’s rise across Asia. The Print.
  • Sauerborn, D. (2014). Tug of War over Afghanistan. Heidelberg University.
  • India, T. T. (2015, 06 10). Modi's remarks in Bangladesh aimed at fanning hatred against them. The Times of India.
  • Tunader, O. (2006). War on Terror and the US Transformation. In M. A. Ifantis, International Security Today understanding change and debating strategy (p. 20). Centre for strategic research.
  • Vasquez, J. A. (1996). Distinguishing rivals that go to war from those that do not: A quantitative comparative case study of the two paths to war. International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 531–558.
  • Waltz, K. N. (2001). Man, the state and war. Colombia University press.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979a). Theory of International politics. University of California.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979b). Theory of International politics. University of California.
  • Wendt, A. (1992). ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it’, International Organization, 46, 394–419.
  • Wilde, B. B. (1998). Security A newframewok for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Yetiv, S. A. (2004). Explaining Foreign Policy: US Decision Making and the Persian Gulf War, Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Haq, Abrar Ul, and Mubeen Adnan. 2022. "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations." Global International Relations Review, V (III): 17-27 doi: 10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).03

HARVARD

    HARVARD : HAQ, A. U. & ADNAN, M. 2022. Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations. Global International Relations Review, V, 17-27.

MHRA

    MHRA : Haq, Abrar Ul, and Mubeen Adnan. 2022. "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations." Global International Relations Review, V: 17-27

MLA

    MLA : Haq, Abrar Ul, and Mubeen Adnan. "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations." Global International Relations Review, V.III (2022): 17-27 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Haq, Abrar Ul and Adnan, Mubeen (2022), "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations", Global International Relations Review, V (III), 17-27

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Haq, Abrar Ul, and Mubeen Adnan. "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations." Global International Relations Review V, no. III (2022): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).03