ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).02      10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).02      Published : Sep 2022
Authored by : Mehnaz Begum , Shabir Ahmed Khan , Muhammad Zubair Khan

02 Pages : 11-16

References

  • Alkon, C. (2011). Lost in translation: Can exporting ADR harm rule of law development. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2011(1), 165-187.
  • Birken, M. A., & O’Sullivan, K. (2019). The Evolution of Mediation in Central Asia: The Perspective of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. In International Organizations and the Promotion of Effective Dispute Resolution, 208-221. Brill Nijhoff.
  • Cappelletti, M. (1993). Alternative dispute resolution processes within the framework of the worldwide access-to-justice movement. The Modern Law Review, 56(3), 282-296.
  • Edwards, H. T. (1985). Alternative dispute resolution: Panacea or anathema. Harvard Law Review, 99(3), 668-684.
  • Farhat, Y. (2018). “Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution: An Evaluation”. UPUEA Economic Journal: 14th Annual Conference, 2018.144-146.
  • Farrow, T. C. (2014). Civil justice, privatization, and democracy. University of Toronto Press.
  • Gowak, S. M. (2008). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Ethiopia- A Legal Framework. African Research Review, 2(2).
  • Hedeen, T., Moses, P., & Peter, M. (2011). Encouraging Meaningful Parent/Educator Collaboration: A Review of Recent Literature. Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education (CADRE).
  • Hollander-Blumoff, R., & Tyler, T. R. (2011). Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (2011). Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2011(1), 1-20.
  • Kamla, D. R. (2020). Resolving conflict through mediation. UNDP in Kazakhstan.
  • Nosyreva, E. (2001). Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States and Russia: A Comparative Evaluation. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 7(1), 7-14.
  • O'Connor, V. (2015). A Guide to Change and Change Management for Rule of Law Practitioners. International Network to Promote the Rule of Law. 1-42.
  • Peerenboom, R. (2002). China’s long march towards Rule of Law. London: Cambridge University.
  • Smith, S. E. (2011). Comment: Trends and Challenges in Bringing Together ADR and the Rule of Law. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2011(1),189-195.
  • Sternlight, J. R. (2006). Is Alternative Dispute Resolution Consistent with the Rule of Law-Lessons from Abroad? Depaul Law Review, 56(2), 569-592.
  • Tamanaha, B. Z. (2017). Understanding legal pluralism: past to present, local to global. In Legal Theory and the Social Sciences, 447-483. Routledge.
  • Tang, W. (2009). Rule of Law and Dispute Resolution in China: Evidence from Survey Data. China Review, 9(1), 73–96.
  • Yanming, W. (2016). New Development of ADR in China.
  • Wenying, W. (2005). The role of conciliation in resolving disputes: a PRC perspective. Ohio State Journal On Dispute Resolution, 20(2), 421-450.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Begum, Mehnaz, Shabir Ahmed Khan, and Muhammad Zubair Khan. 2022. "Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Contemporary World." Global International Relations Review, V (III): 11-16 doi: 10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).02
    HARVARD : BEGUM, M., KHAN, S. A. & KHAN, M. Z. 2022. Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Contemporary World. Global International Relations Review, V, 11-16.
    MHRA : Begum, Mehnaz, Shabir Ahmed Khan, and Muhammad Zubair Khan. 2022. "Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Contemporary World." Global International Relations Review, V: 11-16
    MLA : Begum, Mehnaz, Shabir Ahmed Khan, and Muhammad Zubair Khan. "Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Contemporary World." Global International Relations Review, V.III (2022): 11-16 Print.
    OXFORD : Begum, Mehnaz, Khan, Shabir Ahmed, and Khan, Muhammad Zubair (2022), "Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Contemporary World", Global International Relations Review, V (III), 11-16
    TURABIAN : Begum, Mehnaz, Shabir Ahmed Khan, and Muhammad Zubair Khan. "Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Contemporary World." Global International Relations Review V, no. III (2022): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).02