PERIPHERAL COLD WAR A PERSPECTIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND PAKISTAN RELATIONS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).03      10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).03      Published : Sep 2022
Authored by : Abrar Ul Haq , Mubeen Adnan

03 Pages : 17-27

References

  • Acharya, A. (1994). The Periphery As The Core:the third world and security studies. Strategies in Conflict: Critical Approaches to Security Studies (p. 20). Toronto: the Centre for International and Strategic Studies.
  • Ayoob, M. (1995). The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System, Lynne Rienner.
  • Buzan, B. (1987). An Introduction to strategic military technology and international relations. The Macmillan press.
  • Buzan, B. (1983). People states and fear. Thomas Press.
  • North, C. D. (2003). Institutions and Economic Growth:A historical introduction. In D. A. Jeffry A.Frieden, International political economy perspective on global power and wealth (p. 14). Routledge.
  • Deria, J. D. (1992). Anti-Diplomacy: Spies, Terror, Speed and War, Basil Blackwell.
  • Elman, C. (2006). Realism. In P. D. Williams, Security studies an introduction (p. 12). Routledge.
  • Harbom, L., & Wallensteen, P. (2010). ‘Armed Conflicts 1946-2009’, Journal of Peace Research, 47(4), 501-509.
  • Hari, S. (2004). India & US Relations: Ground Relaities.
  • Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in international politics. Princeton University press.
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1996a). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, Columbia University Press.
  • Khan, H. (2013). Pakistan’s Contribution to the global war on terror after 9/11. IPRI Journal, 13(1), 37-56.
  • Kilgour, D. M., & Zagare, F. C. (2001). The Impact of Conventional Force Reductions on Strategic Deterrence: A Game-Theoretic Analysis. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 7(2), 146–169.
  • Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, 20(1), 39–51.
  • Kolodziej, E. A. (2005). Security and international relations. Cambridge University press.
  • Lalwani, S., & Wheeler, T. (2017). Southern Asia’s Escalating Strategic Competition.
  • Mcdonald, M. (2006). Constructivism. In P. D. Williams, Security studies an introduction (p. 13). Routledge.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. University of Chicago.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1969). Politics among Nations a Struggle for Power and Peace. Peking University press.
  • Mallik, R. (2019). Indo-US Relations during George Walker Bush administration (PhD Thesis). Centre for South Asian Studies, Pondicherry University.
  • Parpart, J., & Shaw, T. M. (2013). Endorsement. Journal of China and International Relations, 1(1).
  • Pande, A. (2019, 04 25). The US wants India to be its partner in confronting China’s rise across Asia. The Print.
  • Sauerborn, D. (2014). Tug of War over Afghanistan. Heidelberg University.
  • India, T. T. (2015, 06 10). Modi's remarks in Bangladesh aimed at fanning hatred against them. The Times of India.
  • Tunader, O. (2006). War on Terror and the US Transformation. In M. A. Ifantis, International Security Today understanding change and debating strategy (p. 20). Centre for strategic research.
  • Vasquez, J. A. (1996). Distinguishing rivals that go to war from those that do not: A quantitative comparative case study of the two paths to war. International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 531–558.
  • Waltz, K. N. (2001). Man, the state and war. Colombia University press.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979a). Theory of International politics. University of California.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979b). Theory of International politics. University of California.
  • Wendt, A. (1992). ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it’, International Organization, 46, 394–419.
  • Wilde, B. B. (1998). Security A newframewok for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Yetiv, S. A. (2004). Explaining Foreign Policy: US Decision Making and the Persian Gulf War, Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Haq, Abrar Ul, and Mubeen Adnan. 2022. "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations." Global International Relations Review, V (III): 17-27 doi: 10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).03
    HARVARD : HAQ, A. U. & ADNAN, M. 2022. Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations. Global International Relations Review, V, 17-27.
    MHRA : Haq, Abrar Ul, and Mubeen Adnan. 2022. "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations." Global International Relations Review, V: 17-27
    MLA : Haq, Abrar Ul, and Mubeen Adnan. "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations." Global International Relations Review, V.III (2022): 17-27 Print.
    OXFORD : Haq, Abrar Ul and Adnan, Mubeen (2022), "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations", Global International Relations Review, V (III), 17-27
    TURABIAN : Haq, Abrar Ul, and Mubeen Adnan. "Peripheral Cold War: A Perspective Study of India and Pakistan Relations." Global International Relations Review V, no. III (2022): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.31703/girr.2022(V-III).03